🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear he endured a loss to Grimsby. He weathered a decisive European final versus a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, undermining the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who frequently berated his squad for losing one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of a England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his nine months of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, he has proved himself as one of football's true generals: a tactical intellect of which United’s mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

A Tactical Clash Regarding System & Ideology

For example, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

The Ultimate Power In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to place the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, but still finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices remain untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire them for using excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and then bin them for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.