🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are paid to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the method the celebration is observed is a manifestation of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the warmer months we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, far-right parties are surging in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A campaign to scrub Black history and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the political figure's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how minimally it can be impactful if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the present. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. An academic expert, a prof at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just do away with observances such as Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an period that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an foundation that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What value has simple recognition of the past when it fails to address the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Organizations who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.